>> ^peggedbea:
3) wait, why are we making fun of what shes saying? because she a young female who speaks fast and perky?



No, because she sounds like a parody of a valley girl. Nothing to do with age or perk-level.

And she is a new Republican. She was registered Democrat until her pops got in the race. It sounds to me like she'll either switch back to Dem, or possibly run for office as a GOP-Reform candidate.

I thought her vlogs&blog during the 08 POTUS race were pretty damn vapid, but now she seems a hell of a lot smarter than I gave her credit for.

Another one for the list:

http://www.videosift.com/video/Vlog-No-Homo

Some "leading" video blogs:
*Boingboing (us): http://www.boingboing.net/archives.html
*Flickr Video: http://www.flickr.com/search/advanced/ (search by media type, only videos)
*StumbleVideo: http://video.stumbleupon.com/
*Ehrensenf (de): http://www.ehrensenf.de/shows
*Rocketboom (us): http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/archives.html
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=ROCKETBOOM
*Neatorama video clips: http://www.neatorama.com/category/video-flash-clips/
*5min - Live Videopedia: http://www.5min.com/
*Daily Dish, The (Andrew Sullivan):
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/archives.html
*Fark video: http://www.fark.com/video/
*Milkandcookies: http://www.milkandcookies.com/
*I am Bored: http://www.i-am-bored.com/
*Glumbert: http://www.glumbert.com/
*Superdeluxe: http://www.superdeluxe.com/

GodTube! Home of the Jesus Vlog.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'treehugger tv video blog' to 'treehugger, vlog, 2006, 00s, new york, international auto show, car, fuel, hybrid' - edited by Eklek

Looked more like a spycam than a vlog, but it adds to credibility.

(I wouldn't necessarily factor in the three previous channels, I would more look at the fact that it isn't a definable category. I will say that one badly missing category -- actually it's the crap I don't want on the sift -- but there is not eFame, vlog, YT idiots, webcam pundits. I would say his vision might almost include that, since it really is the number one usage of YT and we probably are missing out on some up and coming Entertainment2.0.

It's mostly not of sifters tastes, but there might be a market for more mellow criss crocker type videos. I suppose it falls under viral, but WTF is that. We do need more REAL channels like nouns, not concepts and less subjective categories. How about "conspiracies" might fall under the nwo, fringe stuff, but yeah looks like choggie is DOA on this channel request.

Here's the next one http://www.videosift.com/video/Governor-Sarah-Palin-Vlog-2

Tags for this video have been changed from 'music, boburnham, vlog, hilarious' to 'music, boburnham, vlog, hilarious, bo burnham' - edited by doogle

I believe Shiny Shiny is her program/vlog. And I think her name is Zoe.

yep good stuff. and i was watching his vlogs over on vimeo last year:

http://www.vimeo.com/robertreich/videos

well then, perhaps you should go all-out....and expose thyself....?
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=naked+vlog&search_type=

Robert Reich is another opinionated liberal economist. I find his writing to be even more insightful (and often more scathing) than Krugman's.

His blog is a quality read.
http://robertreich.blogspot.com/

He had a vlog briefly too.
http://www.vimeo.com/robertreich

Aah, reminds me of this pancake adventure..
http://www.rocketboom.com/vlog/rb_06_mar_03
this may be siftable as well..non?

no dag, that's a cheap shot, of COURSE i don't think that my personal tastes should match exactly the things that escape the queue. But the slogan here is * quality control, not * upvote competition.

i don't expect the top 15 to be full of my favourite vids, but i also don't expect a newbie to come along with a perfectly good quality vid, within the rules, and get discarded after 48 hours because not enough people even saw the thing, let alone voted.

IMO the only things that should die in the queue should be porn, snuff, boring vlog shit, spam, low bitrate recompressed inaudible phonecam rubbish, etc etc.

Then, once the bad quality is sifted out, we can all have a pissing contest about trying to get into the top 15.

but at the moment, the pissing contest is in the queue already. hence the title jockeying and favouritism. that's the problem. the queue shouldn't be about choosing what is a "good" video, it should be a chance for the crap to be sifted out before the pissing contest. basically if you are going to have a 2 day queue then the escape limit should be 5. then queue escape simply becomes more objective... "five people think this is siftworthy, but it might not be top 15 material, we'll see". if you're worried about starpoint dilution, just leave the starpoint threshold at 10 upvotes.