search results matching tag: Destroy all humans
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.005 seconds
- 1
- »
Videos (4) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (23) |
- 1
- »
Videos (4) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (3) | Comments (23) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
newtboy (Member Profile)
Your video, Destroy All Humans Remake, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
19-year-old hopes to revolutionize nuclear power
Is Fallout good fun Payback (had to ref yer reference)? The only v-games I ever finished were the 1st 2 Ratchet & Clanks, GTA 1, and Destroy All Humans-None of which involved nuclear power of any kind....except DAH, whose antagonist's ship's power source I speak of here so....intelligin..intella
Where the Hell are Matt's 2012 Outtakes
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Harding
Traveller, game designer, guy with a lot of time on his hands.
Credited as the inspiration for the videogame, "Destroy all Humans"
Where do baby robots come from?
Ma-ma. Ma-ma. Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-muh.. vrrrrrr-CHISH -- all humans. Destroy all humans. Destroy all humans.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^Chaucer:
This was only the first round score. It went on:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/13/ibm-watson-takes-jeopardy
-champs/
"Though Watson ended the exhibition in the lead with $4,400 compared to Jenning’s $3,400 and Rutter’s $1,200, a continuation of that battle shown on internal televisions during lunch revealed that Jenning had pulled ahead after scoring a Daily Double. Watson still isn’t perfect, it seems."
>> ^entr0py:
>> ^Chaucer:
Actually, this story has been going around that the computer won. Which is WRONG! If you get the rest of the story, you'll know that the computer ends up getting stomped by Jennings by the end of the segment.
You're probably thinking of a different test. Watson did win the game shown in the video. Though they only played single Jeopardy. http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/ibms-wat
son-supercomputer-destroys-all-humans-in-jeopardy-pract/
Final Score
Watson : $4,400
Ken : $3,400
Brad : $1,200.
I hope they do more of these with v2, v3, v4, Skynet, etc.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
This was only the first round score. It went on:
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/01/13/ibm-watson-takes-jeopardy-champs/
"Though Watson ended the exhibition in the lead with $4,400 compared to Jenning’s $3,400 and Rutter’s $1,200, a continuation of that battle shown on internal televisions during lunch revealed that Jenning had pulled ahead after scoring a Daily Double. Watson still isn’t perfect, it seems."
>> ^entr0py:
>> ^Chaucer:
Actually, this story has been going around that the computer won. Which is WRONG! If you get the rest of the story, you'll know that the computer ends up getting stomped by Jennings by the end of the segment.
You're probably thinking of a different test. Watson did win the game shown in the video. Though they only played single Jeopardy. http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/ibms-wat
son-supercomputer-destroys-all-humans-in-jeopardy-pract/
Final Score
Watson : $4,400
Ken : $3,400
Brad : $1,200.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^Chaucer:
Actually, this story has been going around that the computer won. Which is WRONG! If you get the rest of the story, you'll know that the computer ends up getting stomped by Jennings by the end of the segment.
You're probably thinking of a different test. Watson did win the game shown in the video. Though they only played single Jeopardy. http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/13/ibms-watson-supercomputer-destroys-all-humans-in-jeopardy-pract/
Final Score
Watson : $4,400
Ken : $3,400
Brad : $1,200.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^Chaucer:
Actually, this story has been going around that the computer won. Which is WRONG! If you get the rest of the story, you'll know that the computer ends up getting stomped by Jennings by the end of the segment.
URL for the story?
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^Payback:
>> ^ant:
>> ^quantumushroom:
I for one welcome our new...ah fuck it.
There's a group called "ah fuck it"?
You have another explanation for the popularity of Sarah Palin?
Yeah, because she's hot? j/k!
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^ant:
>> ^quantumushroom:
I for one welcome our new...ah fuck it.
There's a group called "ah fuck it"?
You have another explanation for the popularity of Sarah Palin?
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^entr0py:
>> ^bmacs27:
>> ^ant:
>> ^Zyrxil:
You can only buzz in after the answer is read.
Didn't they used to in the past? What happens if you did it early?
I think there might be a delay before you can buzz again. So it is disadvantageous to buzz early.
That's true, but the delay is only 1/4th of a second. So those contestants you see just furiously spamming the buzzer aren't stupid, it's still a valid strategy. At least you're almost guaranteed to get a buzz in within the first quarter second.
I think this is why the squishy humans have any chance to answer. It's got to be difficult for an AI to precisely judge when a question is over. I wouldn't be surprised if Watson uses the buzzer spam method.
I like to spam.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^bmacs27:
>> ^ant:
>> ^Zyrxil:
You can only buzz in after the answer is read.
Didn't they used to in the past? What happens if you did it early?
I think there might be a delay before you can buzz again. So it is disadvantageous to buzz early.
That's true, but the delay is only 1/4th of a second. So those contestants you see just furiously spamming the buzzer aren't stupid, it's still a valid strategy. At least you're almost guaranteed to get a buzz in within the first quarter second.
I think this is why the squishy humans have any chance to answer. It's got to be difficult for an AI to precisely judge when a question is over. I wouldn't be surprised if Watson uses the buzzer spam method.
Oh, it seems Watson now has an actual buzzer that he has to hit with his robo digit. I'd say giving that thing a finger is a fatal step in the wrong direction.
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^spawnflagger:
From the latter half of the video it seems Watson will only buzz in if the probability of a correct answer is very high (green). If they set the cut-off lower, say 60%, it would have buzzed in much more often.
By the title of the video, I assumed that "destroy" meant the humans would have 0 points... It would have been much more intimidating if they had a "Cyberdyne Systems Model 101" standing between the 2 humans instead of a screensaver.
KILL KILL KILL!
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^quantumushroom:
I for one welcome our new...ah fuck it.
There's a group called "ah fuck it"?
IBM's Watson supercomputer destroys all humans in Jeopardy
>> ^quantumushroom:
I for one welcome our new...ah fuck it.
...trivia-spewing, voice-recognizing, prove-Ken-Jennings-just-has-good-recall, computer overlords?